-
0
Question: We teach about GM crops now, with a big focus on evaluating the technology and looking at ethics. One of the disadvantages listed is the concern about human consumption and how GM could affect us. We have the enzymes required to digest DNA and DNA is universal, regardless of the order of bases, so I’m wondering how GM foods could actually interact with our bodies differently? Does anyone have any ideas of what could happen in theory?
-
Bruno Silvester Lopes answered on 31 Dec 2019:
Few points to consider: GM crops can contain genes from an allergen which can lead to allergic reaction if the food is consumed (classic case of Brazil nut gene cloned in soya bean crop to increase protein content can trigger allergic reaction in people allergic to nuts, https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199603143341103). GM crops can lead to cancer (disease is caused by mutations in DNA and introduction of new genes can trigger this). When crops developed are immune to antibiotics then consumption of such crops can make us immune to antibiotics which in turn can lead the body to not fight against diseases (antibiotics in human body wont work). The research is still ongoing so time will tell how to make better use of GM technology. Hope this helps.
-
-
Nikolai Adamski answered on 7 Jan 2020: last edited 8 Jan 2020 6:33 pm
Dear Katie,
crops grown for human consumption are rightly regulated, although the level of this varies between different technologies. GM crops are under very tight regulations espeically here in Europe. It follows the precautionary principle, which limits (prohibits) the use of new technologies and medicines before sufficient safety tests have been run.
GM crops destined for human consumption follow similar regulations as new drugs, with multiple rounds over a decade or even longer. And since every GM crop is different, each new one has to undergo the same rigourous testing.
These tests look into possible issues with digestion or immune reactions due to the potential creation fo new allergens. A worst case scenario that finds a lot of publicity is the possibility of crops casuing cancer. Cancer medicine has come a long way, but there are many different types of cancer, which are triggered by different stimuli, so this is something that can never truly be fully excluded. But that applies to other technologies as well. I remember when laptop computers were in the press because they might cause testicular cancer; or mobile phones causing ear/brain cancer. What happened with these technologies is that they proved so useful to so many people that these concerns did not find as much traction.
GM crops have not had that moment yet. The first GM crops were modified for herbicide resistance so farmers could kill weeds without killing the valuable crops. These modifications had no discernible use for consumers.
In 1999, a new crop of rice, called the “Golden Rice” was developed. The idea was to enable rice plants to store vitamin A precusors (co-called beta-carotenes) within the rice grain. Vitamin A deficiency is a huge problem in Southeast Asia, leading to blindness in tens of thousands of children each year. Rice is a staple crop in Southeast Asia, so improving its nutrional quality is vital and could improve and even save millions of lives.
Just a few weeks ago (after ~20 years), “Golden Rice” has been approved by the Philippines government after rigourous testing.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/golden-rice-approved-safe-consumption-philippines-180973897/This is despite massive protests by Anti-GM organisations like Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth etc, who have sabotaged field trials in the Philippines in previous years.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-23632042“Golden rice” might be the crop that showcases the possilbe benefits of GM crops not just for farmers, but also consumers and hence might “open the floodgates”. Even then many regulatory hurdles remain like introducing the trait into locally adapted varieties of rice.
The technologies to modify genomes (of plants, animals and bacteria) have moved on in the meantime. Today, a lot of the discussion focuses on genome editing, which the European Court of Justice ruled as a GM technology.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-44953100This is despite gene editing not introducing foreign DNA, but merely deleting/modifiying specific DNA nucleotides, which might happen randomly (solar radiation).
I think I digressed a bit. The issue is complex and simple sounbite statements for or against GM technologies cannot address it.
TL;DR
GM foods can possibly create new allergens or cause cancer. So could any other newly released variety of wheat, peas, etc. All new technolgies face these types of backlash. Crops need to be tested to internationally agreed safety standards. -
Fern Johnson answered on 21 Jan 2020:
Hi Katie, Bruno and Nikolai have given detailed answers, but I would add there is a lot of misinformation about GM foods on the internet, and poor science – just because something is published in a scientific journal, it does not mean that the study was good.
This is an interesting exploring one now notorious study that claimed GM maize caused rats to develop cancer: https://www.nhs.uk/news/cancer/claims-of-gm-foods-link-to-cancer-disputed-by-other-researchers/
Related Questions
Latest Questions
-
Based on the textbook for our course, my understanding is that the main drawback with fusion reactors is how much energy is required to heat the plasma. Do you think the solution for this come from finding ways to make the heating process more efficient, or more likely finding ways to release more energy from the fusion process? Can you give any examples of how scientists have improved the process or the reactors so far to make this more viable as an energy source?
-
We do the classic light interference pattern experiment in class. It’s fascinating to see this setup is still used in current research, i.e. with antimatter positrons as you talk about on your profile.. What other ways do modern researchers investigate the wave nature of particles?
-
What do you see as the potential real world uses of quantum computing? What difference would it make to students’ lives, for example?
-
Can you explain what the wheat TILLING population is? Is it to do with GM?
-
Does anyone know much about stem cell use in therapeutic cloning? One of my students was asking how a group of stem
-
We teach about GM crops now, with a big focus on evaluating the technology and looking at ethics. One of the
-
Is high performance computing going to be the majority of work in particle physics until we can start to make sense of (3 Comments)
-
After you complete your PhD are there lots of opportunities for jobs in your field of particle physics? (4 Comments)
-
Great to see you release data for young people, how as a science teacher can we make the complicated world of particle (5 Comments)
-
Harrison – do you collaborate with the other particle physicists here in the UK or is it a wholly international (3 Comments)
Latest Comments
-
Resource: Genetics CHAT transcript – Tuesday 3rd December 2019 (1 comment)
-
Edoardo - so your models can help us to observe or make sense of what we observe in space? (2 comments)
-
Is high performance computing going to be the majority of work in particle physics until we can start to make sense of (3 comments)
-
Excellent to hear that you are striving to increase the number of women in your field. Having role models like (1 comment)
-
After you complete your PhD are there lots of opportunities for jobs in your field of particle physics? (4 comments)
Comments